RaccoonBot is a Windows executable program designed to automate the majority of tasks including attacking enemy villages in the popular mobile platform MMO Clash of Clans. It is one of many Clash of Clans bots that have only recently begun due to growing demand in the Clash of Clans community for an easier alternative to grinding the repetitive and time consuming task of ‘raiding’ for resources in order to upgrade one’s base/village.
RaccoonBot lags behind its competitors as it is relatively new in the botting community and is not known by most users of these types of programs. As of 14/05/14, RaccoonBot’s member base is a mere 1100 compared to other competitors with members well into the tens of thousands. However, it is steadily picking up pace as its community continues to grow.
In terms of features, RaccoonBot has a userfriendly GUI with no intrusive logos and has its key features listed in the initial General tab which can be turned on and off easily. What really puts RaccoonBot ahead of its competitors is its highly advanced attacking algorithm and although it is still in Open Beta, can already accurately pinpoint collector and storage locations and deploy troops accordingly. Here are a few images demonstrating how RaccoonBot analyses bases.
Other bots use ‘box deployment’ (straight lines along the edge of the map) of troops and very buggy attempts at targeting collectors resulting in some collectors being completely missed out. Additionally, the flexibility of army compositions is unmatched with RaccoonBot’s ‘barrack like’ troop interface, allowing users to easily modify the army they wish to use for botting by click and holding on each troop, just as they would in Clash of Clans. I feel that this would be easily understood by new users.
One major drawback of RaccoonBot is the lack of features. It has only recently implemented a ‘Dead Bases’ feature (attacking bases with collectors full) but still does not have other features such as clan castle troop donating/requesting, spell factory support and more specific customisations for attacking.
I feel that this bot has great potential with its only barrier being time itself. The administrators and developers that own this bot are both professional and highly experienced with multiple projects for other communities such as League of Legends and World of Warcraft and have a total member base of over 100,000. The requests of users are responded to with speed and efficiency and most bugs are usually solved within days. I myself have been a user of many different Clash of Clans bots and have only really felt that RaccoonBot actively responds to the feedback of its users. Bugs encountered in these types of programs lead to the user being completely incapable of running the bot and especially if the program is paid, would mean the money that they invest is lost. Thus, customer service is essential and I believe that RaccoonBot is providing this very well.
In summary, although lacking in features, RaccoonBot does show potential due to the usage of a powerful programming language in comparison to other bots and along with the expertise of its administrators and developers will continue to grow exponentially.
Anyone who wishes to try RaccoonBot, visit their Homepage at: http://www.raccoonbot.com/ . There is also a tutorial available.
Home »
bot
,
Bot Coc
,
clash of clans
,
clashbot
» Best New Farming Bot Clash of Clans (Raccoon Bot)
Best New Farming Bot Clash of Clans (Raccoon Bot)
Posted by admin
Posted on 8:43 PM
with 1 comment
Megasoft-DDL ~ Updated Pada: 8:43 PM
i used lazypressing before and it was great! i get around 250k-300k gold per hour, 150-200k elix per hour (including the donations, lightning strike consumptions, etc...), and i get around 1k to 1.5k de per hour.
ReplyDeletethen i tried gamebot... i get a little below the above stated value, but hey... i saved $100 dollars per year! gamebot is free. well, i dont really mind paying if its a great deal. but a fee for that value versus a free app with only a little difference in the raid, i would go to free all the way.
if they would atleast lower the price by 50%, then that would be a different story. maybe around $50 a year or less with all the good feature would be a competitive (not really a great deal) compared to a free application with slightly less of the features.